<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>disproportionality-Archiv - meier ip</title>
	<atom:link href="https://meier-ip.eu/tag/disproportionality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://meier-ip.eu/tag/disproportionality/</link>
	<description>Your IP service provider.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2022 06:54:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Judges panel in UPC conference</title>
		<link>https://meier-ip.eu/patent/judges-panel-in-upc-conference/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Florian Meier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2022 06:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disproportionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injunction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.meier-ip.eu/?p=467</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The EPO co-hosted a conference on the new unitary patent system in the mid- November 2022. Part of the conference was a judges panel featuring some of the prominent figures that were recently elected to the UPC bench. Various topics were discussed. Just some examples: There appeared to be consensus among the panelist judges that &#8230; </p>
<p class="link-more"><a href="https://meier-ip.eu/patent/judges-panel-in-upc-conference/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Judges panel in UPC conference"</span></a></p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://meier-ip.eu/patent/judges-panel-in-upc-conference/">Judges panel in UPC conference</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://meier-ip.eu">meier ip</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>The EPO co-hosted a conference on the new unitary patent system in the mid- November 2022. Part of the conference was a judges panel featuring some of the prominent figures that were recently elected to the UPC bench. Various topics were discussed. Just some examples: There appeared to be consensus among the panelist judges that it will be rare for a revocation counterclaim to be separated from infringement proceedings and be sent to the central division (unless there are plural revocation counterclaims before different local/regional divisions). The judges’ current views appeared to be less aligned with regard to issues such as disproportionality of injunctive relief. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLbl-Ay8Wv0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">A recording of the conference is still available online</a> &#8211; worth watching if you are interested in this topic.</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://meier-ip.eu/patent/judges-panel-in-upc-conference/">Judges panel in UPC conference</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://meier-ip.eu">meier ip</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
