<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>intervention-Archiv - meier ip</title>
	<atom:link href="https://meier-ip.eu/tag/intervention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://meier-ip.eu/tag/intervention/</link>
	<description>Your IP service provider.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 18:53:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>G 2/24 &#8211; intervener in appeal proceedings</title>
		<link>https://meier-ip.eu/uncategorized/g-2-24-intervener-in-appeal-proceedings/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Florian Meier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 18:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[EPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G 2/24]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G 3/04]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opposition]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.meier-ip.eu/?p=941</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>As reported by the EPO in a Press Communiqué of 25 September 2025, the Enlarged Board of Appeal has rendered decision G 2/24 (“Skin cleanser”) that relates to the procedural status of an intervener in opposition appeal proceedings. The Enlarged Board confirmed its previous decision G 3/04 and concluded that, after withdrawal of all appeals, appeal &#8230; </p>
<p class="link-more"><a href="https://meier-ip.eu/uncategorized/g-2-24-intervener-in-appeal-proceedings/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "G 2/24 &#8211; intervener in appeal proceedings"</span></a></p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://meier-ip.eu/uncategorized/g-2-24-intervener-in-appeal-proceedings/">G 2/24 &#8211; intervener in appeal proceedings</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://meier-ip.eu">meier ip</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>As reported by the EPO in a <a href="https://www.epo.org/en/case-law-appeals/communications/press-communique-25-september-2025-concerning-decision-g-224-skin">Press Communiqué of 25 September 2025</a>, the Enlarged Board of Appeal has rendered decision G 2/24 (“Skin cleanser”) that relates to the procedural status of an intervener in opposition appeal proceedings.</p>



<p>The Enlarged Board confirmed its previous decision G 3/04 and concluded that, after withdrawal of all appeals, appeal proceedings may not be continued with a third party who intervened only during the appeal proceedings (see the EPO&#8217;s <a href="https://www.epo.org/en/case-law-appeals/communications/press-communique-25-september-2025-concerning-decision-g-224-skin">Press Communiqué of 25 September 2025</a>).</p>



<p></p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://meier-ip.eu/uncategorized/g-2-24-intervener-in-appeal-proceedings/">G 2/24 &#8211; intervener in appeal proceedings</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://meier-ip.eu">meier ip</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeal proceedings with intervener</title>
		<link>https://meier-ip.eu/patent/intervention-in-appeal-proceedings/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Florian Meier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 13:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[EPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[procedural aspects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[withdrawal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.meier-ip.eu/?p=906</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In proceedings before the EPO, the question of whether appeal proceedings may be continued, after withdrawal of the sole appeal, with a party who intervened at the appeal stage has been settled for a long time. The Enlarged Board of Appeals (EBA) held in decision G 3/04: &#8220;After withdrawal of the sole appeal, the proceedings &#8230; </p>
<p class="link-more"><a href="https://meier-ip.eu/patent/intervention-in-appeal-proceedings/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Appeal proceedings with intervener"</span></a></p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://meier-ip.eu/patent/intervention-in-appeal-proceedings/">Appeal proceedings with intervener</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://meier-ip.eu">meier ip</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>In proceedings before the EPO, the question of whether appeal proceedings may be continued, after withdrawal of the sole appeal, with a party who intervened at the appeal stage has been settled for a long time. The Enlarged Board of Appeals (EBA) held in decision <a href="https://www.epo.org/en/boards-of-appeal/decisions/g040003ep1">G 3/04</a>: &#8220;After withdrawal of the sole appeal, the proceedings may not be continued with a third party who intervened during the appeal proceedings.&#8221;</p>



<p>In <a href="https://www.epo.org/en/boards-of-appeal/decisions/t231286ex1">T 1286/23</a>, the  Board brings this question before the Enlarged Board of Appeals again. As stated in r. 3.7 of the decision, &#8220;[the] referring Board is &#8230; not in agreement that Article 105 EPC in combination with Article 107 EPC must be read in the sense that also a third party intervening only at the appeal stage can never become more than a non-appealing opponent.&#8221; The referring Board provides detailed reasons for this position in r. 3.7 <em>et seq. </em>of the decision.</p>



<p>Thus, the procedural question pertaining to a party who intervened at the appeal stage is going to be revisited.</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://meier-ip.eu/patent/intervention-in-appeal-proceedings/">Appeal proceedings with intervener</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://meier-ip.eu">meier ip</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
