<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>litigation-Archiv - meier ip</title>
	<atom:link href="https://meier-ip.eu/tag/litigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://meier-ip.eu/tag/litigation/</link>
	<description>Your IP service provider.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 08:29:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>First UPC litigation ranking by JUVE Patent</title>
		<link>https://meier-ip.eu/patent/trends-from-upc-litigation-ranking/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Florian Meier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 08:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UPC law firms]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.meier-ip.eu/?p=867</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Many law firms and (potential) litigants eagerly awaited the first UPC litigation ranking recently published by JUVE Patent. The ranking of December 2024 has revealed a surprising trend: some of the top patent law firms, renowned for their national prosecution and litigation work, are not to be found in the UPC ranking. This includes firms &#8230; </p>
<p class="link-more"><a href="https://meier-ip.eu/patent/trends-from-upc-litigation-ranking/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "First UPC litigation ranking by JUVE Patent"</span></a></p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://meier-ip.eu/patent/trends-from-upc-litigation-ranking/">First UPC litigation ranking by JUVE Patent</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://meier-ip.eu">meier ip</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Many law firms and (potential) litigants eagerly awaited the first <a href="https://www.juve-patent.com/firm-rankings/rankings-upc-2025/upc-litigation-upc-2025/">UPC litigation ranking</a> recently published by JUVE Patent.</p>



<p>The ranking of December 2024 has revealed a surprising trend: some of the top patent law firms, renowned for their national prosecution and litigation work, are not to be found in the UPC ranking. This includes firms that have played a pro-active role in the preparation of the new system (such as BOEHMERT &amp; BOEHMERT with Prof. Goddar) and firms that are ranked in the top tier for national litigation (such as df-mp).</p>



<p></p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://meier-ip.eu/patent/trends-from-upc-litigation-ranking/">First UPC litigation ranking by JUVE Patent</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://meier-ip.eu">meier ip</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
