<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>technically qualified judge-Archiv - meier ip</title>
	<atom:link href="https://meier-ip.eu/tag/technically-qualified-judge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://meier-ip.eu/tag/technically-qualified-judge/</link>
	<description>Your IP service provider.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 09:28:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Technically qualified judges at the UPC</title>
		<link>https://meier-ip.eu/patent/upc-technicall-qualified-judges/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Florian Meier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 09:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[code of conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technically qualified judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TQJ]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.meier-ip.eu/?p=539</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A couple of days ago, one of the technically qualified judges (a colleague from France who is highly respected and very well-known in the community) announced that he will resign from the position as technically qualified judge (TQJ). In his view, the recently published UPC Code of Conduct makes it difficult to discharge of the &#8230; </p>
<p class="link-more"><a href="https://meier-ip.eu/patent/upc-technicall-qualified-judges/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Technically qualified judges at the UPC"</span></a></p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://meier-ip.eu/patent/upc-technicall-qualified-judges/">Technically qualified judges at the UPC</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://meier-ip.eu">meier ip</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>A couple of days ago, one of the technically qualified judges (a colleague from France who is highly respected and very well-known in the community) announced that he will resign from the position as technically qualified judge (TQJ). In his view, the recently published UPC Code of Conduct makes it difficult to discharge of the duties as a TQJ in a manner that is compatible with an attorney’s work for his/her clients. </p>



<p>While this resignment is a significant loss for the bench of the UPC, this ethics and level of reflection is to be applauded. It also contrasts nicely with the “the part-time judge system works for the Swiss Federal Patent Court, hence it is going to work for the UPC”-attitude that I have sometimes heard in the past. (Just to be clear: Of course, such a system can work, but concerns as regards potential conflicts of interest are to be taken seriously.) It will be interesting to see whether this resignment will remain an isolated event or whether more TQJs are going to re-consider the situation in the weeks or months to come.</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://meier-ip.eu/patent/upc-technicall-qualified-judges/">Technically qualified judges at the UPC</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://meier-ip.eu">meier ip</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
